The rising popularity of target-date funds in 401(k) plans could be seen as a sign of progress.
People seem to know that they need help picking the right combination of investments. Increasing numbers of them opt for target-date funds, which are designed to adjust the ratio of stocks to bonds over time, steadily reducing risk.
Last year, in plans offering them, six out of 10 dollars flowed into these automated funds, according to Vanguard.
However, as Greg Iacurci reports for CNBC, a disturbing percentage misuse these “set it and forget it” type products, potentially adding unnecessary risk to their retirement investment planning.
For instance, some choose to buy a target-date fund for perhaps half of their portfolio, then stuff 100% stock funds on top of that.
That might feel like the “core and explore” approach advocated by some financial advisors, but the likely reality is a portfolio that takes on way too much risk than is healthy for this particular retirement saver.
A rising market can make that approach seem smart, but the inevitable market decline — particularly a short, sharp reversal — could trigger second-guessing and lead to panic selling.
Target-date funds in 401(k) plans, used properly, certainly are better than what came before, which too often was employee investors sitting in cash or bonds for long periods.
But the better answer is fundamental guidance so that investment choices reflect personal goals, now and later, as employees approach retirement.
Your legal responsibility as an employer is to make sure that your participants have access to tools and advice that can guide them to the best long-term outcomes.
If your 401(k) plan provider leaves all of the legal responsibility up to you as an employer, it might be time to consider working with a more modern 401(k) manager. One who understands the challenge of supporting the small business owner.
Many 401(k) investors don’t use target-date funds the right way
By Greg Iacurci
Target-date funds have ballooned in popularity over the past 15 years — yet many investors aren’t using them the way they were intended.
The funds were designed as a one-stop shop that put retirement savings on autopilot. Investors are meant to park their nest egg in one fund, generally based on their retirement year, which automatically shifts from stocks to bonds over time.
However, a third of investors aren’t limiting themselves to one target-date fund, according to 401(k) data from Vanguard. They’re piling other funds on top.
Specifically, 27% use TDFs along with other 401(k) mutual funds (like an S&P 500 index fund, for example). Another 2% use more than one target-date fund; 4% use two or more TDFs as well as other funds.
Those who use the funds this way may inadvertently assume more investment risk, according to financial advisors.
“It’s not what you’re supposed to do,” according to Ellen Lander, the founder of Renaissance Benefit Advisors Group, based in Pearl River, New York. “Do I think it’s detrimental? Maybe and maybe not.”
Employers began adopting target-date funds with greater regularity after Congress passed the Pension Protection Act of 2006. The legislation gave legal protections for businesses who automatically enrolled workers into the company 401(k) plan and invested their money in TDFs.
Now, 80% of 401(k) plans offer a target-date fund, according to the Plan Sponsor Council of America. The funds hold 24% of all assets in 401(k) plans, the most of any investment option, according to the trade group.
Among plans that offered a TDF last year, six of every 10 dollars flowed into such a fund, according to Vanguard, which is the largest manager of target-date funds.
Here’s how they work: Let’s say an investor aims to retire in 2040, at age 65. This investor would select the 2040 target-date fund. The fund starts with a large stock allocation and shifts toward cash and bonds over time.
“They’ve done a lot to move things in a more positive direction for many investors,” Christine Benz, the director of personal finance at Morningstar, said of how TDFs have simplified the investment process.
But investing in additional funds may skew one’s asset allocation. Investors who don’t rebalance could end up with more risk than they’d like.
For example, if an investor allocates half of 401(k) assets to a target-date fund and the rest to aggressive growth funds, the TDF would automatically adjust over time but the 50% stock holding would remain constant.
“This is where it probably is detrimental,” said Lander. “I took a strategy designed for my age and risk level and made it hugely aggressive.”
In some 401(k) plans, more than half of target-date investors use them in conjunction with other funds, according to Lander, who consults with employers about their retirement plans.
“I think it’s probably not in the best interest,” Aaron Pottichen, a senior vice president at Alliant Retirement Consulting, based in Austin, said of using TDFs in this manner.
The trend has likely emerged for a few reasons. For one, investment diversification is commonly preached to retirement savers. Owning multiple funds may therefore seem like a logical extension. But in this case, TDFs are already diversified.
“Employees don’t quite understand that the TDF is made up of anywhere from five to 30 other funds,” Lander said. “If you look at your enrollment form, it’s listed there as a fund.”
And investors shouldn’t necessarily shoulder all the blame, according to advisors. Retirement-plan portals may be confusing to investors, for example.
Let’s say a 401(k) investor who’d been auto-enrolled into a target-date fund wants to take a do-it-yourself approach and hand-pick their stock and bond funds. This person may change their future allocation but forget to change how their current dollars are invested if the web portal isn’t clear.
It seems the trend is improving, though. A decade ago, almost half of TDF investors used more than one fund, compared to 33% today, according to Vanguard.
“Directionally, it’s a really great trend,” Benz said.
And there are defensible reasons for investors to have funds beyond just a lone TDF, advisors said.
For example, a 62-year-old investor may hold some side savings in a money-market or stable-value fund, in addition to the target-date fund, as a more liquid bucket of safe money for a potential down payment on a condo, Benz said.
Some may also want to tailor their asset allocation to a more specific degree than a 401(k) plan’s target-date funds are able to provide, advisors said.
“There can be a reason for it,” Lander said. “I think it’s for a very small group of people who would even have the time, interest or knowledge to do that.”
“Do I believe that’s why this is occurring? No,” she added.